Discuss the issue of media publicity affecting people’s personal lives. Some people think publicity is essential, other think there should be means of controlling publication of private information. What is your opinion?

Discuss the issue of media publicity affecting people’s personal lives. Some people think publicity is essential, other think there should be means of controlling publication of private information. What is your opinion?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jbNve3MDw-Q&list=PL2SnntlB81YkHiCWIPU8xNmuN-4LdNgV-

In this contemporary era, media fulfil an unquenchable thirst of people who want to know about their favourite celebrities sometimes it  creates many issues which give detrimental effect  on the personal lives. Seemingly, there are two contrasting views where a section of society vehemently deems that  promotion is indispensable while other believe that personal data should not be leaked by the media and it must be controlled. However, in my contention,  it is constructive as well as destructive trend.

Apparently, printing of secret data by media is beneficial and have many reasons to substantiate it. First and foremost, it is an inevitable contributing factor which provide the every single info about famous people.  So that public can decide that they want to admire the person or not. To corroborate, India is a democratic country and at the time of election media provide every information about the leaders so as consequence ,dwellers can decide that those leaders who participate in elections are loyal or not for the nation and they are capable for their vote or not their image in public is one of the major source to getting the vote . Yet another, the paramount significant reason to broadcast about their personal life is that there is a symbiotic relationship between celebrities and the media because one depend on the other for their existence. For instance, BBC published a survey in which it was mentioned that 57% youth decided their career path after reading about the struggling stories of such artist how they accomplished their goals in their life they told they are the role model of their lives. Eventually, media is conducive to make person famous incontestably, celebrities and any ordinary person conspicuously desperate to stay in the news.  They incessantly need media attention to build their career strong.

 On the other hand, Do publishing every single sort info about personal life always bring irrefutable positive outcomes? Certainly not.  Because media exaggerate and sensationalise the news. As far as is concerned, public personalities also have a private life that they want to shield from other just because they are famous the media does not have the right to intervention in their life or print all sort of secret about them.  Needless to say, famous people have their own image in public, young and old generation admire them if media telecast any personal info about related to their work or religion then sometimes it creates violence and vulgarities in the society.  Allegedly, the paparazzi  could invade the privacy of celebrities they have their family and they have right to spend some quality time with them but media camera’s focused 24*7 to them they not only write about them but also the life of their children, husband and wife which have dismal consequences on their life. 

Having dwelled on such thought it is concluded that once a person becomes famous then his personal life becomes public . so media has the right about provide  info to the public but media should work under their limit they should write those information which is adequate to know and they should allow the famous people to live their lives as normal individual do.