New technologies have changed the way children spend their free time. Do advantages outweigh disadvantages? IELTS WRITING TASK-2 | IELTS

 New technologies have changed the way children spend their free time. Do advantages outweigh disadvantages?

Indubitably, there is paradigm shift in the lifestyle. It is often argued that the world has witnessed revolutionary inventions in terms of science and technology which has partly altered the way children spend their leisure time. However, even though this practice brings about a mixed bag of both boon and bane, demerits outshines merits.

Apparently, outbreak of modernistic technologies set entails myriad detrimental ramifications. First and foremost, if children are glued to the computers all day long, they would not participate in actual conversations. Hence, would develop an anti-social personality. For instance, per Forbes magazine, the younger demographic falls into anti-social personality. Secondly, does it effect their health? Certainly yes, since it involves zero degree of physical activity and eyes on desktop all the time, makes them obese and their eyesight also gets weak. Consequently, it had deteriorating effects on their health in the long run. Thirdly, unlike some traditional games which are passed from one generation to another which represent a link between generations, these novel games emphasize negative themes and promote foul language and obscene gestures. Hence, younglings become numb to violence, imitate the violence, and show more aggressive behavior. 

Nevertheless, it holds constructive benefits. Chiefly, some video games promote both learning, problem solving and help with the development of fine motor skills and coordination. Furthermore, not only children get well acquainted with the rudimentary mechanism of computer system ,but also with its operation which would eventually benefit them in their career at an unprecedented scale. 

To recapitulate, although it has constructive ripples, it’s inherited downsides in terms of health and academics is unsurpassable. Needless to state, cons massively tide over pros. 

With growing population in cities, more and more people live in a home with small or no outdoor areas. Is it a positive or negative development? IELTS WRITING TASK-2 | IELTS

 With growing population in cities, more and more people live in a home with small or no outdoor areas. Is it a positive or negative development?

Indubitably, with the exponential rise in population, the proportionate need for shelter arises. It is often argued that dwellers of urban areas accommodate modestly. However, it is both constructive and destructive trend. 

Apparently, small living spaces holds wide range of constructive benefits. First and foremost, not only flats are cheaper to rent or buy ,but also homeowners of small houses could be able to spend less time on cleaning up their home. For example, according to BBC research it is revealed that 70% of millennial who are studying or just have a job prefer modest accommodations as they save money for leisure pursuits. Secondly, unlike the bygone days, in the modern era large number of residents in rural areas migrate to industrialised areas despite being the fact that the space in city centre is limited. With apartment that are capable of holding tons of families in a building, the surging demand for places to live can be satisfied. Thus, tiny houses help sustain people’s daily needs.

Nevertheless, it entails myriad detrimental ramifications. Chiefly, prudence will not prevail, if children do not develop mentally and physically. with extended families, large space acts as an incentive for their children. For instance, according to Forbes Magazine it is revealed that by playing outdoor activities in gardens or open spaces, people can release stress and children can enhance their immune systems at an unprecedented scale. Furthermore, does lack of space leads to lack of privacy ? Certainly yes, children might find it cumbersome to have a quite place to concentrate on their homework while their parents are watching television.

To recapitulate, although modest accommodations can benefit people in terms of budgets yet the catastrophic repercussions are unsurpassable. Needless to state, it is a mixed bag of both boon and bane.

Some people think that to be successful in sport, physical strength is the most important factor. Others, however, think that it is more important to be mentally strong. Discuss both views and give your opinion. | IELTS WRITING TASK-2

 Some people think that to be successful in sport, physical strength is the most important factor. Others, however, think that it is more important to be mentally strong. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

In the modern era, there is a considerable contribution of research on how one’s body reaps the benefits in sporting events. However, there are predominantly two contrasting views where a section of society vehemently deems that Physical factors are the key factors influencing the results in sporting events while others emphasize that the mentally strong people have big advantage in winning any sporting game.

Apparently, various factors make a section of people advocate that physical power is a factor where one is benefited considerably and have many reasons to substantiate it. Firstly, not only physical tenacity is required to maintain stamina at an unprecedented scale ,but also a strong bulk can be recovered from the injuries faster than a weak body. To corroborate, according to BBC research it is revealed that for some kind of sports rugby, American football, and art-martial having more muscles help to achieve the best scores. Secondly, unlike people who are just mentally strong, sports person with muscular built can participate in heavy weightlifting games. Hence, the physical strength is the host of ostensible factors in acquiring crowning achievement in any sport.

 Nevertheless, some believe that mental vigour is the backbone of a successful team. Chiefly, if certain individuals or the team as a whole lacks mental strength, they'll struggle with certain tasks no matter how much talent they possess. To vindicate, according to Forbes magazine, it is revealed that one of the most admirable tennis players, Roger Federer, he was almost 40 years old. He won a match at the Australian Open for playing more than 3 hours. His competitor was much younger, Oviously, Roger beat him not because of better energy but better wisdom. Furthermore, is emotional control fundamental for a player? Certainly yes, at distinct stages of the game he have to utilize his brain strengths. To elaborate, Andy Roddick, a tennis player, while he was young, he had the most powerful energy than other players. Nonetheless, he had terrible emotional controls. Even he won the initial two sets, he still could mess up if the competitor made him angry. Thus, main aspects of mental strength includes confidence, challenge, commitment and control If one of these elements is missing, the core strength of a team is always going to be in danger of collapsing.

In my profound opinion, although physical durability is needed for any sporting event, mental durability is fundamental in different circumstances. Needless to state, both physical and mental strengths play paramount significant role in any sport.

These days the fashions in clothing are constantly changing. Is this affecting individuals and the environment in a positive or a negative way? IELTS WRITING TASK-2

 

These days the fashions in clothing are constantly changing. Is this affecting individuals and the environment in a positive or a negative way?

Indubitably, there is a paradigm shift in the clothing style of millennial as fashion industry has carved a niche lately. It is often argued that fashions in apparel have diversified over the past decades. However, it is constructive as well as destructive trend. 

Apparently, innovation in fashion styles hold wide range of constructive benefits. Firstly, not only it uplifts the standard of human lifestyle ,but also a host of ostensible factor in updating knowledge about other cultures which comprehends patrons not to restrict to their traditional attire. Secondly, it brings economy prosperity unlike traditional attire such as Japanese kimono, which is hand crafted, vogue clothes are automatically manufactured, they can be produced both faster and are affordable. 

Nevertheless, it entails myriad detrimental ramifications. Chiefly, prudence will not prevail, if massive amount of natural resources are used by clothing industries in order to produce clothes with innovative stuff and designs. For instance, according to Forbes Magazine it is revealed that old clothes are often thrown to landfill sites or burnt and the environment gets contaminated which wreak havoc on ecology. Furthermore, does it make people extravagant and disconnect from their roots? Certainly yes, since following exclusive trends leads to burden on the pockets of dwellers thus imbalances household financial budget. 

To recapitulate, although clothing fads has its own inherited downsides as it hamper people’s mindset and nature to some extent yet it’s constructive ripples in terms of updating community in every aspect is unsurpassable. Needless to state, it is a mixed bag of both boon and bane

In some countries, more and more adults are continuing to live with their parents even after they have completed education and found jobs. Do the advantages outweigh disadvantages? IELTS | IELTS writing task-2

 In some countries, more and more adults are continuing to live with their parents even after they have completed education and found jobs. Do the advantages outweigh disadvantages?

Indubitably, parents are the cornerstone that guides behavioural patterns of children. It is often argued that adults prefer to continue their stay with their parents after finishing the study and getting employed. However, even though this practice brings about a mixed bag of both boon and bane, merits outshines demerits.

Apparently, accommodating with parents hold wide range of constructive benefits. Firstly, not only financial burden gets reduced at an unprecedented scale when someone is sharing a house with parents ,but also has substantial contribution in providing mental support as we know when someone is pursuing their career they been through a plethora of hurdles and in that situation a person need family. Secondly, unlike living independently, when an individual is living with their parents, they most likely no need to do some house chores, like cooking, washing, because in a family tasks are always divided within the members. Hence, it results in adequate hours being available for self care. Thirdly, spending more time together like having meals, seeking advice for work, it stabilises both youngsters healthy minds and relationships. For example, according to BBC research it is revealed that age category of 20 to 30 years staying at home showed signs of better mental and physical health than those living on their own.

Nevertheless, it entails detrimental ramifications. Youngsters become emotionally and financially dependent on their parents. They take a long time to learn to live on their own and adjust in a new environment which hampers their career growth and development.

To recapitulate, although it has its own inherited downsides yet it’s constructive ripples in terms of emotional and financial support is unsurpassable. Needless to state, pros massively tide over cons

Nowadays in many countries women have full time jobs. Therefore, it is logical to share household tasks evenly between men and women. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? IELTS | IELTS writing task-2

 Nowadays in many countries women have full time jobs. Therefore, it is logical to share household tasks evenly between men and women. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?

It is undeniable fact that across the globe women have carved a niche in every arena of society and working full-time to support their families. It is often argued that household chores should be equally divided between men and women. I firmly agree to the given notion. 

Apparently, balanced distribution of responsibilities hold wide range of constructive benefits. Firstly, not only it assists women to grab the right employment based on their qualifications ,but also become supportive of the family. Thereby, if a male permits female to get into the job and co-operates to do household chores together. They can both enhance the standard of living and confer quality education, better amenities which make their children for better growing.

Secondly, unlike the bygone days, in the modern era male can learn how to make cuisines even any emergencies occurs in the absences of his wife. He can cater to children and take part in finishing their homework. At the outset, the rapport between children and their father become strong on an unprecedented scale.

Thirdly, prudence will not prevail, if women has to do housework alone while working full time because working full time is cumbersome. For instance, according to BBC research it is revealed that performing a full-time job is stress full, after the stress full job doing home duties by themselves may lead to the psychological problem. Fourthly, working together is a key factor influencing quality family life. Teamwork will build up together as long as working with each other. Hence, the development of the family depends on mutual understanding.

To recapitulate, it is need of the hour to share a working load between parties for the development of their children and family.

Some scientist thinks that there are intelligent life forms on other planets and messages should be sent to contact them. Other scientists think it is a bad idea and would be dangerous. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. IELTS WRITING TASK-2

Some scientist thinks that there are intelligent life forms on other planets and messages should be sent to contact them. Other scientists think it is a bad idea and would be dangerous. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

The world has witnessed revolutionary inventions in terms of science and technology with exploring extra terrestrial life being most prominent. However, there are predominantly two contrasting views where a section of society vehemently deems that intelligent life forms on galaxies should be contacted while other emphasises it to be destructive. 

Apparently, various factors make a section of people advocate that reaching aliens holds wide range of constructive benefits and have many reasons to substantiate it. First and Foremost, not only other civilisations can enrich existing technologies ,but also can be a host of ostensible factors to understand the complexities of the galaxies and the universe. Thereby, it can be a key factor influencing the answers for numerous mysterious events in the past. For example, an international team of scientists has found 20 more exoplanets that might sustain human life whose physiological structures and needs are similar to human beings to address the problem of overpopulation on earth. Secondly, it can be a contributing factor for both industrial revolution and biotechnological growth as it may provide curative measures for current or imminent problems on earth, such as the rapidly depleting natural resources and the deteriorating eco-system. Hence, the economy will benefit considerably from exchanging products and services.

Nevertheless, some believe that the attempt to communicate with outer space creatures can be hazardous for myriad reasons. Chiefly, if aliens are contacted, it would be a fatal threat to Earth as it is expected the superior one is highly likely to colonise the lesser developed one via warfare or cultural assimilation. For instance, When Christopher Columbus arrived in America, that never turned out well for the natives. Furthermore, it may be plausible that those living beings consider humans as dangerous which can instigate them to attack so, it will lead to more chaos and violence on an unprecedented scale. 

In my profound opinion, although contacting extraterrestrial bodies has its own constructive ripples,  there is a much greater probability that those living beings might harm people. Thus , the successive governments should restrict the experiments of many institutions in order to save the planet Earth.