In some countries, more and more adults are continuing to live with their parents even after they have completed education and found jobs. Do the advantages outweigh disadvantages?
Indubitably, parents are the cornerstone that guides behavioural patterns of children. It is often argued that adults prefer to continue their stay with their parents after finishing the study and getting employed. However, even though this practice brings about a mixed bag of both boon and bane, merits outshines demerits.
Apparently, accommodating with parents hold wide range of constructive benefits. Firstly, not only financial burden gets reduced at an unprecedented scale when someone is sharing a house with parents ,but also has substantial contribution in providing mental support as we know when someone is pursuing their career they been through a plethora of hurdles and in that situation a person need family. Secondly, unlike living independently, when an individual is living with their parents, they most likely no need to do some house chores, like cooking, washing, because in a family tasks are always divided within the members. Hence, it results in adequate hours being available for self care. Thirdly, spending more time together like having meals, seeking advice for work, it stabilises both youngsters healthy minds and relationships. For example, according to BBC research it is revealed that age category of 20 to 30 years staying at home showed signs of better mental and physical health than those living on their own.
Nevertheless, it entails detrimental ramifications. Youngsters become emotionally and financially dependent on their parents. They take a long time to learn to live on their own and adjust in a new environment which hampers their career growth and development.
To recapitulate, although it has its own inherited downsides yet it’s constructive ripples in terms of emotional and financial support is unsurpassable. Needless to state, pros massively tide over cons
No comments:
Post a Comment