Some scientists believe that computers will become more intelligent than human beings. Some people find it as a positive development while others think it is a negative development. Discuss both views and give your opinion. Ielts | ielts writing task-2

 Some scientists believe that computers will become more intelligent than human beings. Some people find it as a positive development while others think it is a negative development. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

It is undeniable fact that technology of computer, tablets and laptops has grown by leaps and bounds over a past decades. It is believed that in coming years it will be more intellectual than homo sapiens. However, there are predominantly two contrasting views where a section of society vehemently deems that it holds wide range of constructive benefits. while others emphasize it is destructive. 

Apparently, various factors make a section of people advocate that artificial intelligence will be vastly smarter than humans and would overtake the human race which is a promising development and has various reasons to substantiate it. First and foremost, not only it has already found its way into numerous aspects of our day-to-day lives, including text, image and speech recognition, but also translation tools, smartphone with a facial recognition feature or communicate with chatbots or intelligent voice assistants such as Siri and Alexa. To vindicate, according to the BBC research 80% of the daily tasks in the offices have been made easy by the introduction of MS Office in computers. Secondly, unlike the bygone days, the first semi-autonomous vehicles are already on the roads. Thanks to a steady increase in available data, continuously improving algorithms and increasingly efficient computers, AI has become more and more powerful in recent decades. In many areas, AI has already surpassed the capabilities of human beings. Strong AI is differentiated by the ability to transfer knowledge and skills from one environment to another and to make decisions in a variety of contexts, even unfamiliar ones. A virtual assistant with strong AI would be able to predict our needs without first receiving instructions. 

https://youtu.be/h_CWULybLnQ

Nevertheless, some people opine that this development has myriad detrimental ramifications. Chiefly, if people are being replaced by the machines or technological gadgets, there would be a prominent rise in the unemployment rate in the industries. To Corroborate, according to the BBC research, it has been proved that 20% unemployment rate gradually increased by the introduction of computers in the workplace. Besides, does the computed work always assist the companies? Certainly no, a small or minute error in the system can lead to a devastating effect in an organization. Therefore, the enhancement can lead to potential problems.

In my profound  opinion, although computers possess a powerful ability to accomplish new assignments yet the development for these  can have dismal consequences on the mankind. Needless to state, computers reach our level of intelligence, they will soon surpass us. After all, they would immediately have enormous advantages when it comes to certain resources – including memory, the ability to multitask and a knowledge base that theoretically includes all of the information the Internet has to offer. Because of these advantages, computers will be able to produce much more in-depth decision-making heuristics and statistics than the human brain. In other words, our brains are limited by biology, whereas the computing systems of the future are not subject to such limitations, at least in theory. intelligent machines should serve the needs of human beings, and not the other way around. 

In some countries, the difference in age between parents and children is greater than in the past. Do you think the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages? Ielts | ielts writing task-2

 In some countries, the difference in age between parents and children is greater than in the past. Do you think the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages?

Indubitably  people born in different ages are different from each other in various aspects. It is often argued in many nations that the age gap between parents and their offspring is getting wider as compared to the bygone era. However, even though this practice brings about a mixed bag of boon and bane, demerits outshine merits.

https://youtu.be/h_CWULybLnQ

Apparently, generation gap entails myriad detrimental ramifications. First and foremost, not only does it create the misunderstandings between parents and their children ,but also leads to communication gap for various discussion of topics. To Vindicate, according to the BBC research the demands for expensive technological gadgets is escalating, the parents refuse to buy and hence 20% of the conflicts are being observed  in the family. Secondly, unlike the bygone days when people used to eat healthy food and stay proactive throughout the  day, these days millennials are becoming lethargic and acquire slow pace to react in a critical situation. Seemingly, With the advent of television and movies, young people are exposed to cultural influences alien to their own families and cultures. Thirdly, does giving birth to a child only makes a person parent? Certainly no, with age comes maturity and the sense of nurturing for a child, as there are several responsibilities to tackle. Thus, areas of difference are Attitudes toward different races and groups, Moral values, Religious beliefs, Respect for others, Political views, Work ethic

Nevertheless, disparity among progenitor and their younglings  hold constructive benefit. Chiefly, if the parents who take time to build their careers have high standard of living and subsequently can provide luxurious benefits to their young ones. To corroborate, a BBC research proved that parents who were well settled could bond better with their children. Hence, a significant age gap between elders and their kids will give good benefit and a wealthy lifestyle.

To recapitulate, although this trend have dismal consequences  leading to the uncommon interest between elder people and youngsters yet there are certain constructive benefits for the same. Needless to state, demerits tide over merits.

In their advertising, businesses nowadays usually emphasise that their products are new in some way. Why is this? Do you think it is a positive or negative development? Ielts | ielts writing task-2

 In their advertising, businesses nowadays usually emphasise that their products are new in some way. Why is this? Do you think it is a positive or negative development?

Advertising is the most effective source for companies to sell their products. It is believed that companies are trying to show their products new in the market. Apparently, modernization and westernization are to be blamed for this universal phenomenon. However, it has negative effect on society.

https://youtu.be/h_CWULybLnQ

Fundamentally, there are predominant factors. First and foremost, not only competition between businesses for selling products is rising day by day, but also manufacturing quality products is vital for companies to succeed. For example, according to the BBC research, it is revealed that the companies who make new products and emphasize that their product is new, have 70% of chance that their product will sell in the market. Secondly, most of the products that companies manufacture are more or less the same as the existing product. However, businesses try to show all of their products as unique. Since people prefer to buy new products in contrast to existing products. Therefore, it becomes inevitable for companies to show their products new while advertising.

Nevertheless, I find this trend negative for various reasons. Chiefly, most of the companies sell fake products in the market, just to show their products as new and unique than their competitors. For instance, according to Forbes Magazine, it is revealed that 30% of the new products that brands launch every year are fake or not value for money. Although selling new products is a great way for businesses to generate immense revenues, companies sell the latest products in the market at sky-rocketing prices. Hence, these products are usually not value for money, they are just a method of making money.

To conclude, both customers and businesses retrieve benefits from launching new products in the market. However, companies should not sell fake products or not value for money products to people.

 

You were studying in an English speaking country and suddenly needed to go back to your home country leaving your course incomplete. Write a letter to your teacher to | ielts | ielts general task-1

You were studying in an English speaking country and suddenly needed to go back to your home country leaving your course incomplete. Write a letter to your teacher to

– Thank him

– Explain the reason you left without completing your course

– say during your course study what did you like most about this course

Dear Mr. Jones,

Hope you are doing good. I am writing this letter with regards to my sudden retrieval of the course during my studies.

https://youtube.com/shorts/bjADclM2jeo?feature=share

I would like to thank you for the knowledge and assistance you have given me. You were always there when I needed your help in not only completing my assignments ,but also for the accommodation problem that I went through initially.

My father got COVID positive last week. Despite being admitted to a hospital in my hometown, his condition is deteriorating gradually and the doctors are not giving any hopes to my mother. I have to travel back to India to look after my father and support my family as I am the only child.

I have learnt numerous things from you during the course that will help me throughout my professional career. Apart from the course related studies, I have also developed and improved my communication skills to a great extent.

Thank you for the kind assistance through the journey.

Yours sincerely,

Nisha Garg

People in developed countries have the tendency to buy more and more things whether they need it or not. Is it a positive or negative development? Ielts | ielts writing task-2

People in developed countries have the tendency to buy more and more things whether they need it or not. Is it a positive or negative development?

Indubitably, since the dawn of civilisation,  food, clothing and shelter altogether make up the basic needs of man to survive in any kind of environment. It is often argued that impulsive buying capacity of the people in developed nations is more as compared to poorer countries. However,  it is a destructive trend.

Apparently, buying numerous stuff or things paves the way for a negative environment. First and foremost, not only does it creates a misconception of security ,but also the false hope of happiness of owning things in abundance. To vindicate, according to the BBC research 70% of the population was found to be dissatisfied and suffering from depression apart from being wealthy. Secondly, unlike the bygone days when there was no race for the survival, these days there is  a cut-throat competition in every prospective career opportunity and due to this stress has multiplied. Hence, buying additional products could enhance the spectrum for tension for an individual.

https://youtube.com/shorts/bjADclM2jeo?feature=share

Furthermore,  the younglings are indulging in the rivalry for having the most latest and new products by getting distracted from their academic routine. To corroborate, according to an article in Forbes, the percentage for the results in board examinations dropped by 20% in the year smart phones were launched. Moreover, do the buying of products indefinitely only affect the upper class? Certainly no, this trend may persuade the lower class people to adopt illegal, corrupt or self-centered practices to quench their unlimited desire of gathering more possession. Therefore, this trend could not be considered positive in any aspect.

To recapitulate, neither the reasons nor the repercussions of unnecessary acquisition has any constructive dimension. Therefore , the trend for overspending  is not at all encouraging for any age group individuals or any nation worldwide.

The flowchart below compares three methods to recruit new employees. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant | ielts Academic writing task-1

 The flowchart below compares three methods to recruit new employees. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant

The given flowchart significantly illustrates the different methods to hire new employees. Overall, there are easy as well as complicated methods for recruitment.

It is evident that first method is much simpler then other two methods. First advertisement is done within the company and then followed by shortlist and interview. However, second method has one additional step and different advertisement criteria in contrast with method one. Which means advertisement is done within the press and after shortlist, interview and test would be conducted. Thus, candidates who passed the interview would get the job as well those who passed the test.

On the other hand, in the third method, which is more complicated then other two methods. External recruitment agency is responsible for advertise the recruitment and advertisement within the company. Before interview, shortlist is presented to employer, then the shortlisted candidates would be interviewed for job offer. 

 

 

The charts below show the changes in ownership of electrical appliances and amount of time spent doing housework in households in one country between 1920 and 2019. | line graph | ielts | ielts writing task-1

 The charts below show the changes in ownership of electrical appliances and amount of time spent doing housework in households in one country between 1920 and 2019. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The given charts significanlty illustrates the changes in ownership of electrical utensils and amount of time spent in housework. Units are measured in percentage of households and number of hours per week.

Overall, percentage of households with electrical appliances increased over time whereas number of hours of housework per week decreased.

It is evident that in year 1920, refrigerator was not owned by anyone. However, the ownership of refrigerator rose rapidly between 1920 and 1940, around half of the population had refrigerator whereas ownership of vaccum cleaner slowy climbed from year 1920 to 90% in 1980. In 2000, refrigerator and vaccum cleaner was owned by everyone.

On the other hand, ownership of washing machine fluctuated over the years. However, in year 1960, washing machine was owned by significant proportion of people. After 20 years, the ownership came down to 60%. In year 1920, 50 hours per week  spent by per household in housework. However, number of hours dropped dramatically between year 1920 and 1980. In contrast, in year 2019, only 10 hours per week was spent. 

 

 

Some people think that robots are very important to human's future development while others think they are dangerous and have negative effects on society. Discuss both believe and give your opinion. Ielts | ielts writing task-2

 Some people think that robots are very important to human's future development while others think they are dangerous and have negative effects on society. Discuss both believe and give your opinion.

Science and technology have revolutionised to a greater extent in this era including robotics. However, there are predominantly two contrasting views where a section of society deems that the evolution of  robots have paramount significance in human development. While other emphasise that it could create detrimental ramifications on human’s life.

Apparently, various factors make a section of people advocate that using robotic techniques can help humans at a significant rate and have many reasons to substantiate it. First and foremost, it not only decreases the labour strength ,but also escalates the manufacturing of the products. hence, the cost of workers decline too. Secondly, unlike the bygone days, the time consumed in making the product has considerably decreased. For example, In SamsungTelevision Lt. , the labourers used to assemble 30 televisions a day whereas with the introduction of robots the television assembly has seen a sharp rise of 30% in a single day, subsequently, the time taken for the production for certain items has decreased with the evolution of science and technology. Furthermore, the benefits of the automated machines are as far as that they can be used for household chores, for instance,  cleaning and dusting of the house.

https://youtu.be/h_CWULybLnQ

Nevertheless, some people believe that self-acting machines have inherited downsides which can not be ignored for various reasons. Chiefly, with the advent of automatic machines, humans tend to lay back and become lazy, if this trend keeps on increasing, the day is not far when a person will not be able to conduct daily routine activities by themselves consequently, leads to multiple health morbidities. Another fundamental weakness of this trend is that it brings a radical change in the lifestyle of people. Besides, the unprecedented health hazards, decreased wages of the workers and less employment for youngsters inadvertently offers only grim prospects for the economic prosperity of the country. Lastly, mostly all multi-national companies use robots on their internet and computers, thereby this may lead to a situation where the robots will know more than a human one day.

In my profound opinion, although robotics have adverse consequences on the developing civilisation, I believe the benefits outweigh the drawbacks. However, strict laws and restriction must be opted by the government to avoid misuse of the automated machines.

Some people think that children should follow their parents’ advice, however, others disagree. Discuss both views and give your opinion. Ielts | ielts writing task-2

 Some people think that children should follow their parents’ advice, however, others disagree. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

Indubitably, teenagers’ character is like molten clay, one can mold these incarnations of God as they want to. However, there are predominantly two contrasting views where one segment of society vehemently deems that parents are true heroes and their offspring should trail their guidance while others emphasis that adolescent should make their choices independently.

Apparently, various factors make a section of people advocate that parents’ advice play a crucial role and have various reasons to substantiate it. To begin with, unlike adolescents, parents have much more exposure and experience of distinct phases of life which is a host of ostensible factors in effective decision-making. For instance, the entrepreneurs can guide their children about fundamental rules and other nuances related to business. Secondly, parents are the corner stone that not only build up good behavioral pattern, but also has selfless conduct for their children. Therefore, parents’ guidance is of paramount significance for strong familial bonds.

https://youtu.be/h_CWULybLnQ

Nevertheless, some people believe that children should not seek parents’ advice for myriad reasons. Chiefly, if children just follow parents’ advice blindly, it might impact their holistic development at an unprecedented scale. For instance, older generation considers internet and social media a waste of time whereas children learn plethora of useful things which enhance their learning. Besides, does this modern era demands more competition and expectations from life than past? Certainly yes, parents can never understand the anxieties of fast-paced life due to the generation gap and lesser struggle in past. Hence, for leading a successful life making independent decisions is fundamentally significant.

In my opinion, although there are compelling reasons for not seeking parents’ guidance, taking an advice from them can enable youngsters to make less vulnerable decisions.

Some people believe that manufacturers and supermarkets should minimize the packaging material used. However, others think that consumers should avoid heavily packaged goods. Discuss both views and give your opinion. Ielts | ielts writing task-2

 Some people believe that manufacturers and supermarkets should minimize the packaging material used. However, others think that consumers should avoid heavily packaged goods. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

Indubitably, a huge amount of packaging can be considered as one of the culprits towards environment degradation. However, there are predominantly two contrasting views where one section of society vehemently deems that factories and stores should bear the obligation for lesser layers of packaging while others emphasize that consumers should take precautionary actions against such companies.

Apparently, various factors make a segment of people advocate that producers should minimize the packaging and have many reasons to substantiate it. To begin with, this approach does not only have profound impact on the consumers at a broad spectrum, but also confine them to follow the guidelines initiated by companies. For instance, Milano company used to unnecessarily pack its single biscuit in plastic cover and then in the box but now they have started packing it directly into the box. Secondly, unlike consumers who cannot afford to be selective in terms of products, manufacturers can use biodegradable and environmentally friendly materials to pack their products. Therefore, the companies must take cautionary actions in selecting packaging materials.

https://youtu.be/h_CWULybLnQ

Nevertheless, some believe that it is the responsibility of consumers for myriad reasons. Chiefly, if the society starts boycotting the companies for creating environmental problems, it can create a pressure on them to change their attitude and eliminate the use of non-biodegradable materials. To vindicate, many companies in America has started using biodegradable material after the citizens boycotted the utilization of plastics. Besides should buyers bring their own carry bags while shopping? Certainly yes, with this practice the staff does not have to wrap their products to facilitate delivery. Hence, consumers have the power and should work together to make it happen.

In my opinion, although both companies and individuals have their own roles in environment conservation, prudence will prevail if concerted efforts are taken up from both sides.

 

It is better to learn the way people lived in the past through films and video record than written documents. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement. | ielts | ielts writing task-2

 It is better to learn the way people lived in the past through films and video record than written documents. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement.

Indubitably, traditional knowledge is of paramount significance and there are innumerable ways for accessing it. It is often argued that the recording of video clips is a better option than written evidences for augmenting conventional information. However, I partially agree with the given notion.

Apparently, video recording holds wide range of constructive benefits. To begin with, the visuals are not only attractive and scintillating, but also retains in memory for a longer duration which is inevitably a contributing factor. To vindicate, a research by TESOL journal states that the word recited by human mind tends to swipe away after twenty minutes whereas videos make long-lasting impact. Secondly, unlike well educated people who can read articles, illiterate citizens can inherit ancient civilization knowledge through cinematography and visualizations. Therefore, films play most important role for retaining history.

My book links : IELTS General writing task-1 & 2 

- https://www.amazon.in/dp/B08D8J3YMS

IELTS Academic writing task-1 & 2 

- https://www.amazon.in/dp/B08PS7FVB8

On the contrary, the perfections supplied by written contexts cannot be replaced. Chiefly, if people remain unaware of various writings and paintings provided by ancestor to the next generation from long time ago on diverse surfaces of material like paper and wall of caves, they will end up building ancestral knowledge without cultivating an emotional connection with them. Besides, does the writings preserve  and give recognition to a particular throne? Certainly yes, these movies are directed to produce appealing and attractive videos for viewers.

YouTube link : https://youtu.be/h_CWULybLnQ

To recapitulate, although there are numerous potential ways to preserve the historical data and significant occurrences from the past, everyone has the right to elect the media based on their tastes.

Some people believe that a lot of scientific research is a waste of money and time. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Ielts | ielts writing task-2

 Some people believe that a lot of scientific research is a waste of money and time. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Indubitably, Science and technology has grown by leaps and bounds over the past decade. It is often argued that the channelising funds and time on these technical explorations is irrelevant. However, I firmly disagree to the given notion.

Apparently, Scientific study holds wide range of constructive benefits. To begin with, unlike bygone days when people used to die because of perilous pandemics, in this scientific era we are evolving at an unprecedented scale by figuring out solutions for these epidemics to save mankind on this earth. For instance, the death-defying disease COVID hit the globe in 2020 and the explorations from scientists has inevitably provided a substantial contribution to control its surge. Secondly, the outcomes from these researches has not only manifested luxurious lifestyle, but also made weather forecasting possible which aided in forest conservation and saving communities from natural disasters like earthquake, tsunami. Therefore, the scientific studies are of paramount significance for sustainable living.

https://youtube.com/shorts/e7fICGo7jQ8?feature=share

Furthermore, if these discoveries are not performed by the country, it is evident that the nation will lack in knowledge and emulations which might eradicate its existence on this earth. To vindicate, the nation without scientific knowledge will be like a human without heart. It will not be able to save itself from the international conflicts. Besides, does it cultivate environmental protection and economy? Certainly yes, the improved decisions in agricultural techniques and water harvesting through scientific information has fortified the environment safety and aided nation in monitory terms. Hence, to save earth, its essential to be aware of science and the potential benefits it offers.

To recapitulate, although strong economy is a necessity when it comes to scientific investigations and it take years to complete the research, nation should focus on innovations and explorations to flourish.

In many places the role of father and mother is changing. Do you think it’s a positive or negative development? Ielts | IELTS writing task-2

 In many places the role of father and mother is changing. Do you think it’s a positive or negative development?

Indubitably, With the advent of globalization, there is paradigm shift in the thought process of people. It is believed that in the contemporary society, the traditional belief that men are breadwinners and women do only household chores is no longer true. these roles are changing vastly at an unprecedented scale. However, it is a constructive trend.

Apparently, the reforming roles offer wide range of productive benefits to the society. To begin with, both the partners are not only independent in terms of their responsibilities, but also are able to share their obligations among themselves which is inevitably a contributing factor in maintaining a prolific relationship. To vindicate, a research conducted by TESOL journal states that single mothers across the globe are doing commendable job in process of upbringing their infants with enough care and financial stability. Secondly, unlike conventional times, male parents get tremendous amount of time to impart moral values and support their babies which is of paramount significance for them. Therefore, young generation find this reversal very useful and valuable for them.

https://youtu.be/h_CWULybLnQ

Furthermore, if men provide helping hand in daily assiduous household tasks to women, it will foster their career growth and their individuality in the society. For instance, men can take care of nutrition and healthy diet of their children aiding women to engross themselves more into their work. Besides, does it enhance decision-making and cognitive skills and religious beliefs across gender? Certainly yes, men are not only the conveyers of decision takers in their families, women play an equal contribution which has undoubtedly provided extraordinary benefits to the family. Thus, this practice is the outcome of feminist movement.

To recapitulate, although in some places still women are confined under foul walls of house, prudence will prevail if concerted efforts are taken up by partners by reforming their roles and responsibilities towards their children and family.

It is becoming increasingly expensive to keep museums open to the public. What do you think is the best way of funding them, Example: the government, business or individual? Ielts | Ielts writing task-2

 It is becoming increasingly expensive to keep museums open to the public. What do you think is the best way of funding them, Example: the government, business or individual?

Indubitably, Museums is a superior source for augmenting knowledge and enhancing cross-culturalism. It is believed that the exceptional expenditures on museums has made it tough to keep them open for public gatherings. However, in my contention, successive government should be responsible for maintaining and bearing the expenditure of museums.

Fundamentally, the government is accountable for myriad reasons. To begin with, the authorities not only earn by charging entry fees for these museums, but also is answerable to the indigenous taxes paid by its citizens. For Instance, every year a nation earns million from tourists visiting museums, this money should be used for maintenance of these places. Secondly, unlike business and individuals, the successive government is liable for its constructive actions toward citizens who elects them. If they have to pay for everything, then government existence is irrelevant. Therefore, the government of the nation is more responsible for the investment when it comes to public places.

 https://youtu.be/h_CWULybLnQ

Furthermore, if government maintains trust among individuals by investing funds on museums, the citizens will serve its society by providing funds during unprecedented times. For instance, the residents of America are always ready to aid its nation as government held itself liable for their benefits. Besides, will it maintain the influence and reputation of government among its inhabitants? Certainly yes, this funding scheme will propel people to vote for the ruling party in all upcoming elections which will inevitably maintain the self-esteem and power. Thus, government will gain more power through these noticeable actions.

 

Suffice to say, although the government has many responsibilities, investments from funds is inevitably a considerable obligation when it comes to public services. 

IN MANY COUNTRIES ART GALLERIES VISITORS HAVE BEEN DECLINING STEADILY. WHAT ARE THE POSSIBLE REASON? HOW TO CHANGE THIS TREND? Ielts | ielts writing task2

 IN MANY COUNTRIES ART GALLERIES VISITORS HAVE BEEN DECLINING STEADILY. WHAT ARE THE POSSIBLE REASON? HOW TO CHANGE THIS TREND?

Galleries are the indispensable places where art of different types is displayed including the history and culture of the country .It is believed that interest of tourists visiting art museum is dropping gradually in some nations . Apparently, modern entertainment attractions and busy schedules of the populace are to be blamed for this universal phenomenon. However, coercive efforts by the government can overcome this perennial issue.

Fundamentally, the predominant factors that evidently trigger it can be observed. First and foremost, not only these art museums have become outdated and boring for the public ,but also with the exponential rise in technology, the expectation of millennials have increased unprecedentedly as in the modern era they prefer to travel  the places with modern facilities and entertainment such as malls fun zones ,cinemas and more. To vindicate, research by BBC revealed that there is a drop by 69% in visitors who travel to art  galleries from last one decade. Secondly, unlike the bygone days, the populace are busy earning the livelihood and might have to work 24/ 7 to fulfill the demands of family so left with no time to visit these galleries. Thus, these are some key factor influencing the decrease in travelers to art museums.

https://youtu.be/h_CWULybLnQ

Nevertheless, there are potential ways to change this trend. Chiefly, if the promotion of galleries are done, it will be conducive in luring  more tourists to these places. To corroborate,as per forbes magazine, in Switzerland the promotion done by the government for the oldest art museum 2 years back resulted in four times more visitors. Additionally, does adding some kind of amusement will help inclining the ratio of tourists to art museums? Certainly yes, since everyone feel delightful to visit the attractions  where  fun and recreational activities are involved as it give them enjoyment.  Hence, these remedies will help to eradicate this menace.

To recapitulate, although the interest of the visitors visiting art galleries has declined, however  these places are the integral part of the  history and tradition of a country . Needless to state , art museums are inevitable places which need to be maintained  and promoted by the government for the visitors to visit to maintain the identity of the country.

Demand for food is increasing worldwide.What is the cause of this?What measures can the international community take to make sure the supply of food is enough? Ielts | ielts writing task-2

 Demand for food is increasing worldwide.What is the cause of this?What measures can the international community take to make sure the supply of food is enough?

Indubitably, food is one of the basic necessity of human being. It is believed that the food demand is rising at an unprecedented scale across the nation . Apparently, continuous growth in population and climate change are to be blamed for this universal phenomenon. However, coercive  efforts by the international community can overcome this perennial issue.

Fundamentally, the predominant factors that evidently trigger it can be observed. First and foremost , not only the population is inclining at an unprecedented scale owing to which food demand is growing exponentially as the food production is not adequate to meet the demand of every individual , but also the wastage of food is one of the prime reason since it has been observed that majority of restaurants and cafes are wasting food on daily basis which could be used to feed the ones who are not getting food . To vindicate,  research by BBC revealed that global population has raised globally  by 60% from last one decade. Secondly, unlike the bygone days, there is a paragridm shift in climate change like depletion of ozone layer , global warming which is destroying the crops yields  and the land of farming due to which the production of crops have dropped gradually. Thus, these  are some key factors influencing increased demand of food.

Nevertheless, there are potential ways to curb this menace which international bodies can take to  en sure the supply of food is enough. Chiefly,  if the modern technology and irrigation methods are used , this will result in fast production of crops and will meet the demand of every individual as using these techniques more and more crops will be yield as compared to traditional methods . To corborrate, as per forbes magazine,  the cultivation of food has inclined in Canada and America  from the last half decade as majority of farmers are using the latest technology and irrigation methods.  Additionally, does making people aware about the control of overpopulation be promising?  Certainly yes, it will reduce the burden on the demand of food and populace will understand the detrimental ramifications of over population. Seemingly, these remedies will help to eradicate  this problem.

To recapitulate, although international community are trying their best to make sure the  demand for crops are met yet society must ensure steps are taken to prevent this problem from deteriorating further. A myriad  of partial fixes exists for the issue yet a permanent solution is still out of reach.

Scientists have been warning for many years about protecting the environment and we must limit the use of energy in our daily lives. Despite warnings, many people do not do this. What are the reasons for that and how people can be encouraged to take interest in protecting this environment? | ielts | ielts writing task-2

 Scientists have been warning for many years about protecting the environment and we must limit the use of energy in our daily lives. Despite warnings, many people do not do this. What are the reasons for that and how people can be encouraged to take interest in protecting this environment?

Indubitably, Global warming is a burning issue across the globe. It is believed even though stringent laws amended by research centers on over exploitation of resources, various individuals remain unaware of the deadly issues it is causing. Apparently, westernization and modernization are to be blamed for this universal phenomenon. However, awareness can be cleverly uplifted considering a slew of remedial measures are taken up.

https://youtu.be/h_CWULybLnQ

Fundamentally, the predominant factors that evidently leads to ignorant can be observed. To begin with, unlike traditional times, the sedentary and luxurious lifestyle are a host of ostensible factors for unlimited consumption of resources. To facilitate this, a research conducted by TESOL journal states that excessive utilization of fossil fuels has led to its depletion since people has been using their commutations even for travelling nearby places. Secondly, it is not only due to the uncontrolled behavior of authorities, but also the self-centered attitude of citizens. Therefore, modern lifestyle and egocentric behavior among individuals are to be blamed for environmental degradation.

Amazon link : IELTS General writing task-1 & 2 - https://www.amazon.in/dp/B08D8J3YMS

Nevertheless, there are constructive ways to motivate citizens for limiting its consumption. Chiefly, if authorities organize awareness sessions and practices on how to conserve natural resources and its paramount significance for our future generation, it will give prolific fundamental outcomes. For instance, short film on how life could be without natural resources could have an unpredictable impact on communities. Besides, should successive governments start the tradition of planting trees for sustainable environment ? Certainly yes, the culture of planting trees on graduation day will be a coercive step. Hence, prudence will prevail if concerted efforts are made to tackle this perennial issue.

To recapitulate, warnings would not be enough to aware people, certain obligations and restrictions imposed by government can aid the practice to conserve natural resources at an unprecedented scale.

The best way for a country to prepare for the future is to invest more resources in its young people. How true do you think of it? What is the best way to invest resources? | IELTS | IELTS writing task-2

 The best way for a country to prepare for the future is to invest more resources in its young people. How true do you think of it? What is the best way to invest resources?

Indubitably, investment strategy is a host of ostensible factors for superior futuristic planning of the nation. It is often argued that nation should channelise more funds on its younger generation for the bright future of a country. Apparently, I firmly agree to the given notion. However, Strategic planning and foolproof methods in providing education are the potential ways that the successive government should possess for better future preparations.

Fundamentally, investing on younger ones hold wide range of constructive benefits. To begin with, unlike other age brackets, younglings are considerably more energetic, eager and curious in matriculating novel expertise and latest technologies which is evidently a contributing factor. To facilitate this, a research conducted by TESOL journal states that 90% of youngsters remain familiar with the latest invention in engrossed research and technology. Secondly, they are not only exceptionally genius and have better cognitive skills, but also offers high level of flexibility and can adapt themselves under any circumstances. Therefore, the resources invested on youngsters will never be a waste in future.

https://youtu.be/h_CWULybLnQ

Nevertheless, there are innumerable conservative ways to invest resources. Chiefly, if government can provide free education and organize scientific tours to deserving and poverty-stricken candidates, this will inevitably encourage them as well as others to give their best for their nation. Besides, should government make investments in science laboratories and government schools for promising development? Certainly yes, the funding made today on renovation of labs and schools according to latest inclination will give exponential profits in future. Hence, through tactical and workable planning a country can prepare for its future.

Suffice to say, although making investments on young citizens will take the nation to an excellent future, concerted efforts by government in an appropriate manner can aid this practice at an unprecedented scale.

In some countries the number of people using bicycle as main transport mode is decreasing, even though it is so beneficial. Why is this so? How can people be encouraged to use more bicycles? | IELTS | IELTS writing task-2

 In some countries the number of people using bicycle as main transport mode is decreasing, even though it is so beneficial. Why is this so? How can people be encouraged to use more bicycles?

Indubitably, in the contemporary era, the trend of sedentary lifestyle has grown by leaps and bounds across the globe. It is believed that despite the fact that bicycles offer potential benefits, its utilization as a transportation facility is demolishing. Apparently, westernization and modernization are to be blamed for this universal phenomenon. However, its usage can be cleverly uplifted provided a slew of remedial measures are taken up.

Fundamentally, the predominant factors that evidently trigger it can be observed. To begin with, other commutes are not only time efficient, but also safer in comparison to bicycles. For instance, buses and cars is a host of ostensible factor to reach workplace faster and perform your duties energetically. Secondly, unlike bicycles, other transportation modes can aid to utilize time to perform multiple tasks along with commutation. Therefore, the constructive benefits provided by other transportation modes overrides the usage of bicycles.

https://youtu.be/h_CWULybLnQ

Nevertheless, prudence will prevail if concerted efforts by government and citizens are taken up in utilizing bicycles as a main transit. Chiefly, if authorities impose excessive inflation on petrol and diesel rates, it will stimulate the consumption of bicycles at an unprecedented scale. To vindicate, an exponential rise in fossil fuels in December 2020 in India has shown a paradigm shift towards the utilization of bicycles by the citizens. Besides, will the installation of government provided bicycles and separate tracks on road considering individual safety will cultivate this positive thought? Certainly yes, this trend has shown tremendous accomplishment in few nations. Hence, awareness and instigation can have substantial contribution in this convention.

To recapitulate, although in the fast-paced life the consumption of other commutes cannot be eradicated, if the coercive steps are taken by government authorities it will seemingly mitigate this practice.