It is becoming increasingly expensive to keep museums open to the public. What do you think is the best way of funding them, Example: the government, business or individual?
Indubitably, Museums is a superior source for augmenting knowledge and enhancing cross-culturalism. It is believed that the exceptional expenditures on museums has made it tough to keep them open for public gatherings. However, in my contention, successive government should be responsible for maintaining and bearing the expenditure of museums.
Fundamentally, the government is accountable for myriad reasons. To begin with, the authorities not only earn by charging entry fees for these museums, but also is answerable to the indigenous taxes paid by its citizens. For Instance, every year a nation earns million from tourists visiting museums, this money should be used for maintenance of these places. Secondly, unlike business and individuals, the successive government is liable for its constructive actions toward citizens who elects them. If they have to pay for everything, then government existence is irrelevant. Therefore, the government of the nation is more responsible for the investment when it comes to public places.
Furthermore, if government maintains trust among individuals by investing funds on museums, the citizens will serve its society by providing funds during unprecedented times. For instance, the residents of America are always ready to aid its nation as government held itself liable for their benefits. Besides, will it maintain the influence and reputation of government among its inhabitants? Certainly yes, this funding scheme will propel people to vote for the ruling party in all upcoming elections which will inevitably maintain the self-esteem and power. Thus, government will gain more power through these noticeable actions.
Suffice to say, although the government has many responsibilities, investments from funds is inevitably a considerable obligation when it comes to public services.
Excellent👍
ReplyDelete