Governments should spend more money on medical research and less on researching the environment. To what extent do you agree or disagree? IELTS | IELTS writing task-2

 Governments should spend more money on medical research and less on researching the environment. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Indubitably, successive governments use distinct strategies to channelize funds across different departments to cater the needs of everyone. It is often argued that supreme bodies should allocate more funds in the field of medical sciences and research as compared to the research being done on environment. However, I partially agree to this notion.

Apparently, whopping investment in making advancements in the field of medicine holds wide range of constructive benefits. First and foremost, medical advancements will not only help to bring down the mortality rates of adults in the nation, but also increase the life expectancy rates of newly born babies at an unprecedented scale. For example, according to BBC news nations which spent more than 50% of their annual budget on medical research reported 80% less deaths than other nations where government did not  invest enough in the medical field. Secondly, unlike other sectors, investing in medical research will help government prepare better for outbreaks like CoVID-19 and provide nation wide vaccines at a much quicker and efficient way. Thus, authorities should invest heavily in medical research.

On the other hand, allocating sufficient amount of funds for research on environment is of paramount significance for myriad reasons. Chiefly, research on different environmental factors will not only provide us better understanding about our surroundings, but also help scientists understand causes of various life threatening diseases faced by humans and animals. For instance, according to Forbes magazine nations spending higher amount of funds on enviroment studies were able to reduce medical problems of their citizens 70% more efficiently than nations who didn't spend enough moeny. Furthermore, investing in environmental studies and research will help government find alternatives to the already depleting sources of energy like coal and petroleum. Hence, government should continue to invest in researches on environment.

In my profound opinion, researches on both environment and medical sciences has substantial contribution. Hence, government should channelize funds according to well designed strategy rather than giving preference to one particular field out of the two.

Some people say that protecting the environment is the government’s responsibility. Other believe that every individual should be responsible for it. Discuss both views and give your opinion. IELTS | IELTS writing task-2

Some people say that protecting the environment is the government’s responsibility. Other believe that every individual should be responsible for it.Discuss both views and give your opinion.

Indubitably, environmental degradation has become a burning issue. It has increased at an alarming rate leading to the loss of biodiversity, ozone layer depletion. Nonetheless, prudence will prevail if coercive steps are taken up. However, there are predominantly two contrasting views where a section of society vehemently deems that preservation of environment is the prime duty of successive governments while other emphasizes  that every human being must be liable for it.

Apparently, various factors make a section of people advocate that authorities should work for sustainable living and have many reasons to substantiate it. Firstly, not only supreme bodies should train more people working in public services to collect trash ,but also introduce tough regulations on factories with a limit on waste allowance. To corroborate, according to BBC research it is revealed that the largest amount of pollution is normally created by big enterprises and factories thus urban areas need to be protected from the poisonous fumes, which factories frequently discharge into the atmosphere and only governments have the power or ability to restrict or force them to control pollution in a reasonable measurement. Secondly, unlike cities, factories need to be shifted to countryside by legal bodies. On top of that, creating both TV programs to educate citizen and organising campaigns to spread awareness among people can mitigate environmental problems. 

Nevertheless, some believe that each person can have substantial contribution in protecting their own neighbourhood for myriad reasons. Chiefly, if everyone use their own vehicles only in rare cases, it would protect the climate at an unprecedented scale. To vindicate, according to Forbes Magazine, it is revealed that Cars are considered a major host of ostensible factor of air pollution. Their exhaust gases contaminate the air, ranging from carbon dioxide to unburnt carbon. Hence, a paradigm shift in the behaviour of patrons can alleviate this perennial issue. Furthermore, does reduction in the usage of plastic bags bring constructive ripples in environment? Certainly yes, since it Saves energy. Reduces greenhouse gas emissions, which contribute towards climate change. Reduces the amount of waste that needs to be recycled or, in developing countries, sent to landfills/incinerators. Saves money, since reusable items work out cheaper than constantly purchasing more plastic.

In my profound opinion, environmental degradation can be mitigated by collaborative efforts of both governments and individuals.