some people think that driverless cars are better for society where others do not agree with. Discuss both views and give your opinion? IELTS | IELTS writing task-2

 some people think that driverless cars are better for society where others do not agree with. Discuss both views and give your opinion?

westernisation and modernization has brought a paradigm shift in the metamorphosis of whole world. Owing to explosion of technology, driverless cars over shadowed the manual transportation. However, there are two contrasting views where section of society vehemently deems that driverless cars are more beneficial to society due to various reasons. While others believe that artificial intelligence can not replace the human intelligence.

Apparently, numerous factors make a section of society advocate that driverless cars have substantial contribution.  To begin with, they are algorithm based functioning and automatic robotic system which adequately perform driving and parking in an efficient way as a result this technology based software not only helps in reduction of traffic congestion, but also brings a constructive ripples in terms of overconsumption of fuel which are now prominent concern for whole world. For instance, in developed countries extensive research has been going on the manufacturing designs in fact in some cities in USA some autonomous models are giving successful results. Secondly, unlike the bygone days, in this contemporary era, the group of disabled persons can make most out of it as it is programmed to the destination. 

On the other hand, some believe that this technology can not fully replace the human brains for a plethora of reasons. Chiefly, in worst scenario by breaking traffic rules by different lane drivers, there would be chances of crash at an unprecedented scale which automatically designed cars unable to tackle. To corroborate, CTV news recently provided a news that in New York the police issued a ticket to driverless car almost crossing the red light despite being passed all the protocol of manufacturing and declared as the successful experiment. Additionally, if the car's software or any system fails, an automatic car may place the driver at higher risk.

In my profound opinion, although there are some shortcomings with this design yet with the collaboration of all the scientist and government financial support more amendments in design, more research can make a design comparable to human brain which is still a faraway goal.

Some people say it is the government responsibility to transport children to school. Others believe parents should transport their children to school. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. IELTS | IELTS writing task-2

 Some people say it is the government responsibility to transport children to school. Others believe parents should transport their children to school. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

Gone are the days when younglings used to commute themselves on foot and cycle to school. Owing to increased traffic and working parents, transportation to and from school has become one of the prominent trend. However, there are two contrasting views where section of society vehemently deems that its solely government liability to make arrangements for children commuting to school. While others emphasizes that parents should take that responsibility as they can play this role diligently.

Apparently, various factors make people to advocate the fact that regime should allocate some budget towards schools buses. To begin with, not only citizens pay taxes so authorities could allocate part of the revenue to design school buses, but also middle class working parents can be benefited  considerably as they can not afford to pick and drop their kids to school. For instance, in developed countries regime provide a free bus service for kids for commutation to school which makes students independent and aware of using transportation services. Secondly, unlike the bygone days, in this contemporary era, schools are far away from residential areas. On top of that, employing professional drivers can guarantee young students’ safety and a constructive way to conserve energy and reduce fumes from private cars.

On the other hand, some believe that parents should take this initiative for numerous reasons. Chiefly, if parents drop and pickup their striplings, they can protect them from unfortunate incidents which has exponentially risen over a past decade. To corroborate, national crime bureau agency has published a recent report in which it is published that 60% kidnapping, drugs dealing, rape has happened in 2020 in India involving schools bus drivers and security guards. Additionally, it can create a beautiful bond between parents and children when they drop them and share some quality time asking them about their daily ventures and coming projects in school. Moreover, there are more fundamental matters for successive governments to perform, improving health care and building infrastructure. Hence, taking care of younger ones is mainly parents onus rather than governments.

In my profound opinion, although government can introduce the free bus services yet parents should spare some time to help them commute because no one else would be as vigilant as the parents for safety and scrutiny of their offspring. 

Some parents buy their children whatever they ask for, and allow their children to do whatever they want. Is this a good way to raise children? What consequences could this style of parenting have for children as they get older? IELTS | IELTS writing task-2

 Some parents buy their children whatever they ask for, and allow their children to do whatever they want. Is this a good way to raise children? What consequences could this style of parenting have for children as they get older?

It is evident that parents often shower their children by buying whatever they ask and allowing them to pursue whatever they want. Apparently, this is not a constructive way of raising a child. However, this style of parenting can lead to an increase of irrational demands by children as they turn older.

Fundamentally, many parents now-a-days provide excessive liberty to their children which has lot of demerits. Firstly, children at a learning age should be taught the value of restraining their urges and spontaneous purchases by their parents, as doing so will help children understand the value of things they have in their possession and provide them an insight regarding their privilege. For example, according to a recent study conducted by BBC it was found that 40% children stop respecting their elders if their demands are not met, this is responsible because of high expectations set by the parents in terms of purchases and liberty provided to their offspring.

Nevertheless, style of parenting can instil a regressive attitude among children which is responsible for negative consequences. Chiefly, an impression of dependency is established in children for every purchase due to which they are unable to manage their finances in a controlled way when they reach adolescence. Furthermore, parents who devote their lives fulfilling every demand of their children often fail to save up enough capital for their own retirement which declines their quality of life altogether in the long run. More importantly, children who are raised in an independent environment tend to be tad bit careless as compared to their peers and often fail to recognise the repercussions their actions can have in life. 

To recapitulate, parents are widely suggested to provide a not only natural upbringing to their children in an environment which is liberating ,but also should not refrain from taking charge to further educate them on what they have as compared to what they want.

Many people argue that in order to improve educational quality, high school students are encouraged to make comments or even criticism on their teachers. Others think it will lead to loss of respect and discipline in the classroom. Discuss both views and give your opinion. IELTS | IELTS writing task-2

 Many people argue that in order to improve educational quality, high school students are encouraged to make comments or even criticism on their teachers. Others think it will lead to loss of respect and discipline in the classroom. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

Quality of education is a host of ostensible factor in developing the future of students. However, there are two contrasting views about raising standards  of education system where one section of society vehemently deems that children should have a freedom to ask questions and being critique of their teachers brings positive development in the understanding. while other emphasizes that this practise would create destructive ripples in the classroom discipline and would undermine teachers.

Apparently, various factors make a section of society advocate that students should be encouraged  to enquire their doubts and also provide feedback on the teaching skills of their classroom teachers. To begin with, not only it will enhance the Confidence of students to participate in giving feedback and ask their queries, but also it would be of paramount significance for teachers  and whole class as everyone get a chance for improvement and better understanding of the things. For instance, the Japanese schools introduce it as a part of their curriculum once a year in which peers and teachers collaboratively participate in the discussion also filled out the feedback forms which all teachers accepts in a supportive way. Secondly, unlike the old traditional schools, it will generate the honest relationships between two parties as teacher can understand the calibre  of each pupil and mould their teaching methods without any prejudices and disparities among their students. Hence, it is a tactic to trigger educational quality.

On the other hand, some believe that teachers are respectful as they are known as the builders of nations so it would bring dismal consequences in career of teachers and also break the classroom discipline for various reasons. Cheifly, if students get freedom to being a critique of their mentors,they would definitely take advantage of this opportunity and try to sabotage the teachers character and work against the protocols of whole class. To corroborate, According to BBC research most of the teachers resign from their designations in USA as they were facing a brutal feedbacks and also intimidating threats from high school students . As a result they felt worthless and opt for quitting their jobs. Additionally, does it has a catastrophic effect on class room scenario? Certainty, yes notorious group which is also called ‘Backbenchers’ disrupts the whole environment due to their negative intentions. As they would keep on interrupting the teachers while taking classes and also provide a negative feedback of the teachers which further affects their career at an unprecedented scale. 

In my profound opinion, although students should get a chance to provide feedback and enquire  their teachers for their self doubts yet this should be in a supportive manner which would bring fruitful impacts both on the students and teachers. 

Many jobs require ongoing training and research to stay competitive in a world with rapidly evolving information and technology. Some believe that it is the responsibility of businesses to pay for this training for their staff while others feel it is up to the individual. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. IELTS | IELTS writing task-2

 Many jobs require ongoing training and research to stay competitive in a world with rapidly evolving information and technology. Some believe that it is the responsibility of businesses to pay for this training for their staff while others feel it is up to the individual. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

Mammoth rise in advancements in technology has brought a paradigm shift in the execution of work. Owing to this revolution numerous workplaces need constant training and research based sessions for survival. However, there are two contrasting views where section of society vehemently seems that it is responsibility of employers to train their workers. While others emphasizes that every individual should take initiative for training.

Apparently, various factors make a section of people advocate that employers should allocate their budget towards any sort of education and training. To begin with, not only companies will be benefitted considerably due to skilled workers capable of bringing growth of companies at an unprecedented scale ,but also such investment will give a sense of security to employees. For instance, Most of Canadian banks provide a training in IT skills and new technology so that they can be more efficient in making right decisions and perform excellent jobs. Secondly, unlike the bygone days , in the contemporary era, computer overshadowed the manual techniques and methods in various job sectors which definitely require skilled personnel to perform task at workplace on a fast paced than manual process. Hence, for the upgradation and prosperity of the organisation it is of paramount significance to channelise funds on training sessions. 

On the other hand, some believe that each individual should take initiative for personal growth by taking some courses online for myriad reasons. Chiefly, if an employee spend by themselves, he could do training in another field of his interest so as to expand his knowledge resulting in more opportunities to start a new job. To corroborate, BBC has released a survey in which it is depicted that employees were more serious and regular in training sessions when they paid the fees by themselves. Additionally, does it give personal freedom to choose the subject, trainer and institution? Certainly yes, in personally financed education trainee does not need to wait for the approval of the manager or board members.

 

In my profound opinion, although employees should introduce themselves to new skills on their own pockets yet it is also important for employers to make possible to provide a free training and education to their employees who are not financially strong.

Success is often measured by wealth and material possessions. Do you think wealth is the best measure of success? What makes a successful person? IELTS WRITING TASK-2

 Success is often measured by wealth and material possessions. Do you think wealth is the best measure of success? What makes a successful person?

Monetary wealth is a crucial aspect in today’s time. It is often argued that success of a person is often gauged by wealth and material possessions. Apparently, the criteria of judging a persons success should not be limited to wealth. However, financial knowledge is what defines a successful individual.

Fundamentally, a person’s success can be determined from a plethora of attributes. Firstly, academic qualification, career achievement, and mental development are all forms of favourable result which not equate to funds. For example, according to BBC research it is revealed that the ability to put in efforts and the dedication to succeed makes the person a winner. Secondly , an employee who works in a lower-paid job and the salary is adequate to support the family so he/she found pleased, which is a real success.

Nevertheless,  an individual who has supreme knowledge of managing their finances is deemed successful. Chiefly, people that learn to utilize their money to open multiple gateways where they can diversify their portfolio by making investments that further grant favourable returns thus increasing their initial capital. Additionally, success is a subjective phenomenon which can equate to several outcomes. For example, a person is claimed to be successful if they secure a high paying job at an Indian MNC after graduating from a business school. Meanwhile a first generation immigrant working multiple jobs is considered a success by their family for working towards their goals despite the obstacles.

To recapitulate, not all progress translates to cash at hand. Being successful as a person is equally proportionate to the goals one has set and accomplished for themselves in their life.