some people think that best way to reduce time spend travelling to work is to replace park and gardens close to the city centre with apartment buildings for commuters, but other disagree. Discuss both points of views and give your opinion? IELTS | IELTS WRITING TASK-2

 some people think that best way to reduce time spend travelling to work is to replace park and gardens close to the city centre with apartment buildings for commuters, but other disagree. Discuss both points of views and give your opinion? 

In the modern era, commute to workplace is becoming herculean task for most of the people. However, there are two contrasting views where section of society vehemently deems that there should be replacement of parks and recreational sites in to apartment buildings near the city centre to avoid long travelling time to work While others emphasizes that it would make the situation more devastating in terms of heavy congestion near city centre.

IELTS General writing task-1 & 2 - https://www.amazon.in/dp/B08D8J3YMS IELTS 

Academic writing task-1 & 2 - https://www.amazon.in/dp/B08PS7FVB8

Apparently, various factors make a section of people advocate that transforming parks and other entertainment parks in to apartment building would save the time to travel to their workplaces. First and foremost, not only people will get definite advantage to travel to their job areas by just minutes of walk ,but also it would significantly save money which they can further allocate to their other family expenses. For instances, BBC showed in recent research that people living closer to their jobs are more enthusiastic and productive instead people who spend long and exhausting hours while travelling to work. Secondly, unlike the commuters who always get frustrated after a bad traffic jam to work and get back to home in a bad mood further which affects their family on an unprecedented scale, being close to the work able to make them relax and chilled out as they can spend quality time with their loved ones.

On the other hand, some people believe that park and gardens should not be converted as they have a paramount significance in daily life and this paradigm shift would be destructive for lifestyle of society for myriad reasons. Chiefly, prudence will prevail, if there are more parks. people always need some recreational activities to keep them motivated and fit for the hectic lifestyle so in long term people can not survive without parks and gardens because they spend few hours of their day in parks prefer walking, exercising and meeting people to remain active. Thereby, these recreational sites has become an essential part of our life which helps to maintain a balance in work and life. Additionally, does it has adverse effect of health? Certainly yes, since there would be more chances of traffic and overpopulation because if every one move towards centre of city it would be more congested and polluted. Hence results would be more disastrous. 

In my profound opinion, although it would be solution to one problem yet it can cause a plethora of issues which would bring detrimental effects on society. Eventually all these stress factors comes back to workplace from where this whole idea emerged out.