Some people think that parents should limit the hours their children spend watching TV and playing computer games and encourage them to read books instead. Do you agree and disagree?
It is an undeniable fact that excess of everything is harmful and restrictions some time create bottlenecks. It is often argued that children should be restricted on watching TV and playing digital games and should be persuaded to read books. However, I firmly agree to the given notion.
Apparently, applying constraints on teens hold wide range of constructive benefits. To begin with, watching TV not only stimulates violence in younglings, but also promotes vulgarity which has detrimental effects on them. For example, streaming channels like Netflix and prime videos has no censor board and these are dreadfully accessible and vulnerable for juveniles. Secondly, unlike traditional games which were cultivating promising development, the digital games have become addictive for teenagers eventually compromising their studies and social growth. On top of it, games like PUBG and Blue whale are inspiring them to commit suicide.
Furthermore, books on the other side always enhance knowledge and stimulates people to become good citizens. In contestably, we have numerous autobiographies of successful people and if younger ones read them, it will instill good practice in them generating ethical society. Besides, is consuming a book healthy habit when compared to telecommunications? Certainly yes. To vindicate, Seattle National Research Institute stated that teenagers having study routine fosters mental health and stimulation.
To recapitulate, Although one should play video games, watch documentaries and browse their favorite shows, the time students spent on electronic components should be confined and parents must inculcate moral practice in them of discovering books for their holistic development.
No comments:
Post a Comment