In many countries, women join armies as men do. However, some people argue that army solely needs men. What is your opinion?
It is an undeniable fact that the participation of women even in dangerous fields is no longer a myth. However, it is often argued that military forces should only be applicable to men even though women have set her foot in nearly every realm. Nevertheless, in my contention, females can also provide considerable contribution to the defense just as males do.
Apparently, having women in armed forces hold wide range of constructive benefits. To begin with, women not only possess the defense attributes like courage, dedication, and emotional stability ,but also inherits intellectual and cognitive skills in which their counterparts lack. For instance, the courage shown by Ms. John of Arc in France in defending her people and becoming a martyr is worth remembering. Secondly, unlike past days, nowadays wars are fought technologically which undermines the importance of masculinity. Hence, a woman irrefutably holds key qualities of a warrior in dire straits.
Additionally, if woman comes to leadership in army, it will lead to reduction of conflicts between the nations as women are naturally less aggressive and peace makers and these qualities are considered a blessing for force. Besides, are women not capable of taking jobs with adventures and high risks? Certainly no, women have proven themselves in various other fields like police department, air force and navy which are as riskier as defense. Therefore, they are a blessing to every nation and should be given freedom to choose.
To recapitulate, although women have some physiological barriers, in every realm she has carved a niche at an unprecedented scale so she should have the freedom to take in defense force.
Vry nice ma'am
ReplyDelete