Some people believe that old public buildings in the city should be restored while other say that this should be demolished and new buildings should be build instead .discuss both sides and give your opinion.
Public construction sites hold a firm place in history. history not only repeats itself but also it shapes future.There are two contrasting views where one section of people vehemently deems that rejuvenation of old public constructions shall be welcomed warmly while other emphasize that rather than Maintaining these public ancient structures brand new buildings should substitute older buildings.
Apparently, various factors make a section of people advocate that we should preserve public sector infrastructure. To begin with, ancient structures represent historical value of the place and it shapes the identity or culture of the city. For instance, 2019 BBC report crowned Asia as the place of most historic buildings this Asian respects their respective cultures or trends than whole of the European people. Secondly , the cost of repairing or refurbishment is significantly lower than building a brand new site. Thirdly, the modernization requires lesser manual work so people prefer opting digital medium rather than visiting manually so it makes no sense to invest a huge chuck of money in replacing old buildings.
On the contrary, is the idea of having latest technology equipped buildings tempted ? Certainly yes. Some people believe that old structures should be destroyed for once and all in favor or brand new buildings. Chiefly, the safety concern of people is too hard to ignore . The prime example would be the Published report by BBC where they showed exponential rise in accidents happened due to current dreadful conditions of public sector buildings . Moreover, as we all know that technology is growing by leaps and bounds so having a newly constructed site with all the latest technological equipment helps in getting the work done in quite less time . Moving ahead , ancient public buildings are relatively large in size however the modern technology invention computer requires lesser space so extra vacant area could be utilized for additional services . To corroborate, BBC posted a report indicating that Paris council authority decided to replace all order public buildings with quite latest ones and resultant the area required was much smaller than previously occupied which later on used for hospitality services.
In my profound opinion, although the historical importance of public sector buildings holds a firm place in the cultural heart of a city yet the safety concerns of people are too hard to ignore.
No comments:
Post a Comment